Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram.

PubWeight™: 1.60‹?› | Rank: Top 4%

🔗 View Article (PMID 18498798)

Published in Ann Thorac Surg on June 01, 2008

Authors

Sjoerd M Lagarde1, Johannes B Reitsma, Anna-Karin D Maris, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Olivier R C Busch, Hugo Obertop, Aelko H Zwinderman, J Jan B van Lanschot

Author Affiliations

1: Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. soerdlagarde@hotmail.com

Articles citing this

Impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity after esophagectomy: is there room for improvement? World J Surg (2014) 1.43

A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients does not influence postoperative outcome or long-term survival. Ann Surg Oncol (2011) 1.03

Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J Surg (2011) 0.99

Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today (2013) 0.97

Decreased core muscle size is associated with worse patient survival following esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus (2013) 0.93

Major perioperative morbidity does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg (2013) 0.87

Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: A value-based comparison. J Surg Oncol (2015) 0.82

Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin (2009) 0.78

Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. World J Surg (2016) 0.77

The value of esophagectomy surgical apgar score (eSAS) in predicting the risk of major morbidity after open esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis (2016) 0.77

Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg (2008) 0.75

Original scoring system for predicting postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today (2014) 0.75

Esophagectomy for cancer in octogenarians: should we do it? Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 0.75

Articles by these authors

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2003) 16.17

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med (2011) 15.02

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ (2003) 10.80

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2003) 10.28

Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med (2010) 10.21

Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2012) 9.19

Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med (2002) 8.72

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med (2003) 8.58

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 8.13

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem (2003) 7.92

Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med (2004) 7.87

Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med (2004) 6.87

Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol (2006) 6.03

Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med (2007) 5.05

Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials. J Clin Oncol (2014) 4.59

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med (2015) 4.32

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol (2006) 3.78

Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet (2011) 3.54

Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ (2006) 3.34

Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA (2007) 3.30

Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 3.00

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Fam Pract (2004) 2.99

Residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy frequently involves the mucosa and submucosa. Ann Surg (2013) 2.79

Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg (2007) 2.78

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology (2003) 2.73

Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. J Clin Oncol (2006) 2.72

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.71

Clinical features, complications, and outcome in adults with pneumococcal meningitis: a prospective case series. Lancet Neurol (2006) 2.67

Treatment of acute posttraumatic stress disorder with brief cognitive behavioral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry (2007) 2.65

International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg (2015) 2.61

Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2011) 2.57

Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg (2005) 2.21

Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase 2 expression in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology (2002) 2.19

Management of liver hemangiomas according to size and symptoms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2007) 2.16

Antecolic versus retrocolic route of the gastroenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg (2014) 2.15

Methotrexate versus cyclosporine in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med (2003) 2.12

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem Lab Med (2003) 2.10

Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg (2012) 2.09

Prevalence and triggers of syncope in medical students. Am J Cardiol (2003) 2.08

Delayed massive hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery: embolization or surgery? Ann Surg (2005) 2.06

Cortisol and post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry (2007) 2.06

Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem (2005) 1.98

Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin". Radiology (2013) 1.96

Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg (2009) 1.96

Long-term functional outcome and risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatment for low and high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin. Dis Colon Rectum (2008) 1.92

Childhood constipation: longitudinal follow-up beyond puberty. Gastroenterology (2003) 1.89

Short- and long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in men versus women. Am J Cardiol (2006) 1.89

Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromized patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2008) 1.88

Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2013) 1.86

The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life. Ann Surg (2003) 1.84

Quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients waiting for surgery is seriously impaired. J Surg Oncol (2006) 1.82

Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg (2010) 1.81

Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis. Crit Care Med (2007) 1.80

Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35-60 years. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol (2006) 1.79

Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor). Ann Surg Oncol (2006) 1.78

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J (2003) 1.76

Remission of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology (2013) 1.71

Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology (2005) 1.70

Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage. Ann Surg (2010) 1.70

Comparison of Transgastric NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for detection of peritoneal metastases. Ann Surg (2009) 1.68

[Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (2010) 1.66

A risk score for unfavorable outcome in adults with bacterial meningitis. Ann Neurol (2008) 1.66

Value of history-taking in syncope patients: in whom to suspect long QT syndrome? Europace (2009) 1.65

Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Acad Radiol (2003) 1.64

Preoperative assessment of tumor location and station-specific lymph node status in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg (2013) 1.64

Initial experiences of an enhanced recovery protocol in esophageal surgery. World J Surg (2013) 1.63

Do we still need EUS in the workup of patients with early esophageal neoplasia? A retrospective analysis of 131 cases. Gastrointest Endosc (2011) 1.60

Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc (2006) 1.59

Serum mesothelin for diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol (2012) 1.59

Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clin Chem (2008) 1.58

The STARD initiative. Lancet (2003) 1.57

Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review. Radiology (2005) 1.56

Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child (2012) 1.54

Observer variation in MRI evaluation of patients suspected of lumbar disk herniation. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2005) 1.54

A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools. J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 1.51

Beyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic tests. Clin Chem (2012) 1.49

Validation of a nomogram predicting complications after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg (2010) 1.47

The presence and mucin histochemistry of cardiac type mucosa at the esophagogastric junction. Am J Gastroenterol (2004) 1.46

External validation of the Emergency Trauma Score for early prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med (2014) 1.46

Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg (2011) 1.46

IVF with preimplantation genetic screening, a promising new treatment with unexpectedly negative health outcomes: the Hippocratic role of Data Monitoring Committees. Hum Reprod (2007) 1.45

Endoscopic and percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg (2009) 1.45

Barrett's oesophageal adenocarcinoma encompasses tumour-initiating cells that do not express common cancer stem cell markers. J Pathol (2010) 1.44

Sacral resection in cancer surgery: surgical technique and experience in 26 procedures. J Am Coll Surg (2004) 1.44

Prospective evaluation of non-pharmacological treatment in vasovagal syncope. Europace (2010) 1.42

Prediction of appropriateness of local endoscopic treatment for high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma by EUS and histopathologic features. Gastrointest Endosc (2004) 1.40

The sentinel node concept in adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2009) 1.39

[Preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head tumours: more complications] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (2010) 1.38

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Pathological Tumor Extent in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer. Ann Surg (2017) 1.38

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J (2003) 1.36