Published in Acta Orthop on February 01, 2009
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis. PLoS One (2014) 0.87
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care (2003) 12.01
Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest (2004) 11.84
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol (2002) 6.40
Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med (2003) 4.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2005) 2.61
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 15. Disseminating and implementing guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.57
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.51
Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: Are surgeons getting better? A questionnaire survey of members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.29
Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal. Acta Orthop (2007) 1.18
Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 1.09
Principles of teaching evidence-based medicine. Injury (2006) 0.93
Compliance of Dutch orthopedic departments with national guidelines on thromboprophylaxis. A survey of Dutch orthopedic thromboprohylaxis. Acta Orthop (2005) 0.82
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2011) 22.39
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 8.43
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2015) 6.03
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2010) 5.80
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2002) 5.57
An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29
A Trial of Wound Irrigation in the Initial Management of Open Fracture Wounds. N Engl J Med (2015) 5.28
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ (2002) 4.84
Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA (2012) 4.58
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). J Med Internet Res (2004) 4.45
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 3.58
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.36
Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language. ACP J Club (2004) 3.32
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: introduction. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 3.31
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg (2010) 3.30
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ (2005) 3.26
Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2009) 3.22
Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2010) 3.13
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2007) 3.06
Antivirals for treatment of influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.05
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
The safety of long-acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2008) 3.01
Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 3.01
A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Part I. Risk of Bias and Outcomes: Common Pitfalls Plastic Surgeons Can Overcome. Plast Reconstr Surg (2016) 2.89
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83
Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2004) 2.76
Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus. J Bone Miner Res (2015) 2.74
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). J Med Internet Res (2004) 2.59
An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol (2004) 2.58
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. BMJ (2004) 2.55
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 2.55
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.46
Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. N Engl J Med (2009) 2.35
Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma use for orthopaedic indications: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012) 2.31
Surgery for hip fractures: Does surgical delay affect outcomes? Indian J Orthop (2011) 2.30
Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems. Crit Care Med (2006) 2.29
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.29
How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA (2012) 2.28
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci (2013) 2.25
The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis. CMAJ (2002) 2.24
Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 2.20
Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2009) 2.15
Integrating mortality and morbidity outcomes: using quality-adjusted life years in critical care trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2012) 2.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15
The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2008) 2.07
Prevalence of abuse and intimate partner violence surgical evaluation (PRAISE) in orthopaedic fracture clinics: a multinational prevalence study. Lancet (2013) 2.00
Complex limb salvage or early amputation for severe lower-limb injury: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Orthop Trauma (2007) 1.99
Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.97
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis: What Does the Evidence Suggest? Reg Anesth Pain Med (2016) 1.97
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ (2008) 1.94
Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 1.90
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.90
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Prognostic value of troponin and creatine kinase muscle and brain isoenzyme measurement after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology (2011) 1.87
Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ (2013) 1.86
Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. BMJ (2012) 1.85
Relation between lung function and RBC distribution width in a population-based study. Chest (2003) 1.83
Fasting glucose is a risk factor for breast cancer: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2002) 1.83
Executive summary: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest (2008) 1.81
Systems medicine and integrated care to combat chronic noncommunicable diseases. Genome Med (2011) 1.78
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.75
Pulmonary function and abdominal adiposity in the general population. Chest (2006) 1.74
Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care. Crit Care Med (2008) 1.74
How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand (2004) 1.70
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.67
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.66
Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2010) 1.66
Therapeutic ultrasound and fracture healing: a survey of beliefs and practices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2004) 1.65
Reporting of outcomes in orthopaedic randomized trials: does blinding of outcome assessors matter? J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007) 1.65
Use of antifibrinolytic therapy to reduce transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of randomized trials. Thromb Res (2008) 1.64
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? BMC Med Res Methodol (2006) 1.63
Provider factors associated with intramedullary nail use for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010) 1.62
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.60
Geographic variation in device use for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.60
Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection. Acta Orthop (2014) 1.59
Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci (2012) 1.59