Published in J Med Internet Res on September 24, 2004
Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res (2004) 8.85
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ (2008) 6.72
Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 4.18
Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res (2007) 3.10
Will web surveys ever become part of mainstream research? J Med Internet Res (2004) 2.93
Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol (2006) 2.86
New times, new needs; e-epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol (2007) 2.15
Emergency physicians' perceptions of health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc (2007) 1.87
Impact of the cost of cancer treatment: an internet-based survey. J Oncol Pract (2010) 1.73
Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone. J Med Internet Res (2007) 1.39
How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Saf Health Care (2010) 1.32
Differences in reach and attrition between Web-based and print-delivered tailored interventions among adults over 50 years of age: clustered randomized trial. J Med Internet Res (2012) 1.16
Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey. Br J Cancer (2012) 1.04
Dogslife: a web-based longitudinal study of Labrador Retriever health in the UK. BMC Vet Res (2013) 0.99
KIDMAP, a web based system for gathering patients' feedback on their doctors. BMC Med Res Methodol (2009) 0.95
Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys. J Med Internet Res (2013) 0.93
The effect of reminders in a web-based intervention study. Eur J Epidemiol (2012) 0.89
Internet communities for recruitment of cancer patients into an Internet survey: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud (2006) 0.86
Discussing sexual health in spinal care. Eur Spine J (2015) 0.83
A randomized trial of the impact of survey design characteristics on response rates among nursing home providers. Eval Health Prof (2011) 0.83
Incorporating CanMEDS and subspecialty training into paediatric residency programs: Why are we still deficient? Paediatr Child Health (2012) 0.83
Nephrologists' perceptions of renal transplant as treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, preemptive transplant, and transplanting older patients: an international survey. Exp Clin Transplant (2011) 0.82
Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology. BMC Med Educ (2016) 0.75
U.S.-Mexico cross-border workforce training needs: survey implementation. J Inj Violence Res (2011) 0.75
Patient responses to research recruitment and follow-up surveys: findings from a diverse multicultural health care setting in Qatar. BMC Med Res Methodol (2016) 0.75
The opinion and response of health professionals associated with academics about the research design and methods: A study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent (2016) 0.75
The long term outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function after spinal surgery for cauda equina syndrome. PLoS One (2017) 0.75
The establishment of an ethical guideline for genetic testing through citizen consensus via the Internet in Taiwan. J Med Internet Res (2010) 0.75
Discussing reproductive health in spinal care, part II: fertility issues. Eur Spine J (2016) 0.75
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol (1997) 21.55
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ (2002) 19.50
Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med (2001) 7.69
Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res (2001) 6.82
Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract (2003) 6.31
Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Br J Gen Pract (1994) 5.37
Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q (2000) 4.55
Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics (2003) 4.06
Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods. Occup Med (Lond) (1999) 2.23
Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone. Am J Gastroenterol (2001) 2.08
National plastic surgery survey: face lift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg (2000) 1.87
E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs. Gerontologist (2001) 1.78
Current state of office laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc (2000) 1.51
Practice patterns in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: a postal and internet survey. Urology (2001) 1.51
Treatment of closed tibia shaft fractures: a survey from the 1997 Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Osteosynthesis International--Gerhard Küntscher Kreis meeting. J Orthop Trauma (2000) 1.40
Surgeons' preferences for the operative treatment of fractures of the tibial shaft. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2001) 1.40
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 28.70
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 23.44
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74
Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2008) 13.15
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2009) 12.16
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 11.80
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa and North America: a meta-analysis. JAMA (2006) 11.71
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 8.43
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 7.04
High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med (2013) 6.56
Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA (2010) 5.90
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 5.67
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2002) 5.57
A Trial of Wound Irrigation in the Initial Management of Open Fracture Wounds. N Engl J Med (2015) 5.28
Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in India (CREATE): a prospective analysis of registry data. Lancet (2008) 5.27
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ (2002) 4.84
Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA (2012) 4.58
Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ (2004) 4.53
Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 4.46
The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med (2009) 4.41
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med (2012) 4.32
Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med (2013) 4.27
An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 4.25
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2014) 3.96
Combined corticosteroid and antiviral treatment for Bell palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2009) 3.81
A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 3.75
The safety of addition of nitrous oxide to general anaesthesia in at-risk patients having major non-cardiac surgery (ENIGMA-II): a randomised, single-blind trial. Lancet (2014) 3.70
The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials (2002) 3.62
Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ (2002) 3.57
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg (2011) 3.57
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ (2010) 3.54
Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.44
An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med (2002) 3.36
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.36
Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol (2002) 3.36
Patients at the center: in our practice, and in our use of language. ACP J Club (2004) 3.32
Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med (2015) 3.31
Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg (2010) 3.30
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ (2005) 3.26
Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2009) 3.22
The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 3.20
Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.14
Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2010) 3.13
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2007) 3.06
Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 3.01
Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.95
Does ratification of human-rights treaties have effects on population health? Lancet (2009) 2.93
Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care (2004) 2.93
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91
Oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.91