Published in Med Decis Making on June 21, 1991
International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 2.75
The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol (2009) 2.68
Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys (2008) 1.86
A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features. J Digit Imaging (2013) 0.98
Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images. J Digit Imaging (1998) 0.88
Individual magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in subjects with unilateral knee pain: the health, aging, and body composition study. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 0.87
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography. Radiology (2009) 0.84
Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples. Biomed Imaging Interv J (2010) 0.78
Validity assessment and determination of the cutoff value for the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need among 12-13 year-olds in Southern Chinese. Int J Oral Sci (2012) 0.77
Natriuretic Peptides and Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Asymptomatic Persons. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep (2010) 0.77
Screening for left ventricular dysfunction: a step too far? Heart (2002) 0.75
Using Machine Learning to Identify Benign Cases with Non-Definitive Biopsy. Healthcom (2013) 0.75
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology (1982) 79.76
A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology (1983) 30.77
Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. JAMA (1994) 11.32
Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (1994) 8.80
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med (1982) 7.85
Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol (2001) 7.46
Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry (1988) 7.17
Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med (1975) 6.28
Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med (1997) 4.84
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. A practical approach. Med Decis Making (1985) 4.47
Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med (1981) 4.34
Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med (1978) 4.23
Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology (2000) 4.02
Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography--do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med (1998) 4.01
Outcome of myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration patients as compared with medicare patients. N Engl J Med (2000) 3.67
The swine-influenza decision. N Engl J Med (1976) 2.91
Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making (1984) 2.88
Use and misuse of the term "cost effective" in medicine. N Engl J Med (1986) 2.82
Appropriateness of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction among Medicare beneficiaries. Managed care versus fee for service. N Engl J Med (2000) 2.75
Variations in length of stay and outcomes for six medical and surgical conditions in Massachusetts and California. JAMA (1991) 2.71
Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology (2001) 2.67
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med (1990) 2.67
Acute myocardial infarction in the Medicare population. Process of care and clinical outcomes. JAMA (1992) 2.45
Value of bone scanning in neoplastic disease. Semin Nucl Med (1984) 2.35
Variation in the use of cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (1995) 2.32
Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys (2000) 2.11
Variations in the utilization of coronary angiography for elderly patients with an acute myocardial infarction. An analysis using hierarchical logistic regression. Med Care (1995) 2.00
CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology (1991) 1.94
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Ontario and New York State: which rate is right? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Ann Intern Med (1997) 1.89
Survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with end-stage renal disease: results from the cooperative cardiovascular project. Am J Kidney Dis (2000) 1.79
Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology (2000) 1.70
Physicians' liking for their patients: more evidence for the role of affect in medical care. Health Psychol (1993) 1.69
Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Science (1979) 1.68
Clinical decisionmaking. Med Care (1985) 1.67
Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. Acad Radiol (2000) 1.65
Web-based digital radiology teaching file: facilitating case input at time of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1998) 1.63
Treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction among patients of cardiologists and generalist physicians. Arch Intern Med (1998) 1.62
The scintigraphic definition of pulmonary embolism. JAMA (1974) 1.62
Measures of clinical efficacy. The value of case finding in hypertensive renovascular disease. N Engl J Med (1975) 1.59
Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. Acad Radiol (2001) 1.58
Microparticulate-induced phlebitis. Its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med (1985) 1.52
Interactive virtual endoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1997) 1.51
Comparison of use of medications after acute myocardial infarction in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare. Circulation (2001) 1.48
The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1994) 1.47
Pitfalls in assessing the quality of care for patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Med (2001) 1.45
Quality of ambulatory care after myocardial infarction among Medicare patients by type of insurance and region. Am J Med (2001) 1.45
Design and implementation of a new radiology consultation service in a teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1994) 1.43
Trends in the use of drug therapies in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1988 to 1992. J Am Coll Cardiol (1994) 1.41
Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology (1998) 1.36
A diagnostic strategy using ventilation-perfusion studies in patients suspect for pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med (1976) 1.34
Primary versus secondary ovarian malignancy: imaging findings of adnexal masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study. Radiology (2001) 1.34
CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology (1997) 1.29
CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology (1996) 1.28
Temporal changes in the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1987 through 1990. JAMA (1993) 1.28
Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. Med Phys (2000) 1.28
Duration discrimination by rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process (1976) 1.27
Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: a multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions. Radiology (1995) 1.24
American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1998) 1.24
Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology (1988) 1.23
Impact of underuse, overuse, and discretionary use on geographic variation in the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Med Care (2001) 1.23
The influence of race on the use of surgical procedures for treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities. Arch Surg (1995) 1.23
Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology (1994) 1.20
Computed tomography: cost and efficacy implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1978) 1.18
A comparison of ambulatory test ordering for hypertensive patients in the United States and England. JAMA (1984) 1.16
The use of ambulatory testing in prepaid and fee-for-service group practices. Relation to perceived profitability. N Engl J Med (1986) 1.16
Resident film interpretations and staff review. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1981) 1.15
Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease. Int J Qual Health Care (1998) 1.14
Percutaneous aspiration biopsy of the pancreas under ultrasonic guidance. N Engl J Med (1975) 1.12
Ventilation-perfusion studies and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: concise communication. J Nucl Med (1980) 1.11
Development and validation of a claims based index for adjusting for risk of mortality: the case of acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol (1995) 1.10
Medical implications of computed tomography ("CAT scanning") (second of two parts). N Engl J Med (1978) 1.10
Assessing quality of life after surgery. Control Clin Trials (1991) 1.09
Medical implications of computed tomography ("CAT scanning") (first of two parts). N Engl J Med (1978) 1.07
Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology (1992) 1.06
A prospective evaluation of computed tomography and ultrasound of the pancreas. Radiology (1982) 1.06
Determinants of physicians' preferences for alternative treatments in women with early breast cancer. Tumori (1987) 1.06
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology (2001) 1.05
Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications. Med Phys (1992) 1.05
Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation. Percept Psychophys (1978) 1.04
Measures of clinical efficacy. Cost-effectiveness calculations in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive renovascular disease. N Engl J Med (1975) 1.03
Computed tomography, ultrasound, and scintigraphy of the liver in patients with colon or breast carcinoma: a prospective comparison. Radiology (1983) 1.02
Computer-aided detection: there is no free lunch. Radiology (2001) 1.01
Traumatic aortic rupture: plain radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1981) 1.01
Paired receiver operating characteristic curves and the effect of history on radiographic interpretation. CT of the head as a case study. Radiology (1983) 1.00
Methods to calculate the lens efficiency in optically coupled CCD x-ray imaging systems. Med Phys (1994) 1.00
Advances in biomedical imaging. JAMA (2001) 0.99
Impact of patient preferences on the selection of therapy. J Chronic Dis (1981) 0.99
Incidentally discovered mass of the adrenal gland. Surg Gynecol Obstet (1986) 0.99
The influence of diagnostic radiography on the incidence of breast cancer and leukemia. N Engl J Med (1986) 0.98
Evaluation of hepatobiliary imaging by radionuclide scintigraphy, ultrasonography, and contrast cholangiography. Radiology (1979) 0.97
Differences in ambulatory test ordering in England and America. Role of doctors' beliefs and attitudes. Am J Med (1987) 0.97
Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol (1988) 0.97