Published in PLoS Med on September 21, 2010
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev (2015) 11.05
Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies. BMJ (2013) 3.57
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 2.59
Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev (2015) 2.10
Systematic review automation technologies. Syst Rev (2014) 1.84
Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res (2013) 1.69
Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med (2014) 1.58
The TrialsTracker: Automated ongoing monitoring of failure to share clinical trial results by all major companies and research institutions. F1000Res (2016) 1.52
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med (2016) 1.47
A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med (2012) 1.47
Impact of Open Data Policies on Consent to Participate in Human Subjects Research: Discrepancies between Participant Action and Reported Concerns. PLoS One (2015) 1.42
Systemic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging technologies. Quant Imaging Med Surg (2016) 1.40
Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review. BMC Med (2017) 1.39
The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews. Eur Spine J (2013) 1.36
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med (2013) 1.36
A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 1.28
Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013. J R Soc Med (2013) 1.25
Establishing a new journal for systematic review products. Syst Rev (2012) 1.16
The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ (2012) 1.15
The use of systematic reviews and other research evidence in disasters and related areas: preliminary report of a needs assessment survey. PLoS Curr (2013) 1.15
Screening nonrandomized studies for medical systematic reviews: a comparative study of classifiers. Artif Intell Med (2012) 1.11
Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer. BMC Med (2016) 1.10
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals. PLoS One (2012) 1.09
OvidSP Medline-to-PubMed search filter translation: a methodology for extending search filter range to include PubMed's unique content. BMC Med Res Methodol (2013) 1.08
Toward modernizing the systematic review pipeline in genetics: efficient updating via data mining. Genet Med (2012) 1.04
Feature engineering and a proposed decision-support system for systematic reviewers of medical evidence. PLoS One (2014) 1.03
Beyond information retrieval and electronic health record use: competencies in clinical informatics for medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract (2014) 1.03
A comparison of statistical methods for identifying out-of-date systematic reviews. PLoS One (2012) 1.02
The Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe): an informatics foundation for the science of clinical research. J Biomed Inform (2013) 1.01
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration. Syst Rev (2013) 1.00
Evidence for disaster risk reduction, planning and response: design of the Evidence Aid survey. PLoS Curr (2011) 0.98
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open (2013) 0.96
An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs). PLoS One (2013) 0.95
Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Syst Rev (2015) 0.95
Systems of service: reflections on the moral foundations of improvement. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 0.93
EBMPracticeNet: A Bilingual National Electronic Point-Of-Care Project for Retrieval of Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Information and Decision Support. JMIR Res Protoc (2013) 0.92
Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput Biol (2013) 0.92
Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Prevent and Treat Delirium in Older Patients: A Systematic Overview. The SENATOR project ONTOP Series. PLoS One (2015) 0.91
Evidence gaps in ENT surgery - a qualitative survey. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2016) 0.91
Feasibility of a rapid response mechanism to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country: a case study. Implement Sci (2014) 0.91
Navigating a successful course through GI fellowship: a year-by-year perspective. Gastroenterology (2013) 0.91
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res (2012) 0.90
Learning from hackers: open-source clinical trials. Sci Transl Med (2012) 0.90
A case study of discordant overlapping meta-analyses: vitamin d supplements and fracture. PLoS One (2014) 0.89
Systematic reviews and health policy: the influence of a project on perinatal care since 1988. Milbank Q (2011) 0.88
The use of drugs is not as rational as we believe… but it can't be! The emotional roots of prescribing. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2011) 0.86
Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Syst Rev (2013) 0.86
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q (2016) 0.86
time for person centered research in neuroscience: users driving the change. Ann Neurosci (2014) 0.86
Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods. Syst Rev (2013) 0.85
Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO. Open Med (2011) 0.85
Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination. BMC Med (2015) 0.84
What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev (2016) 0.83
Evidence of and recommendations for non-pharmacological interventions for common geriatric conditions: the SENATOR-ONTOP systematic review protocol. BMJ Open (2015) 0.83
Knowledge Transfer within the Canadian Chiropractic Community. Part 1: Understanding Evidence-Practice Gaps. J Can Chiropr Assoc (2013) 0.82
CareTrack Kids-part 1. Assessing the appropriateness of healthcare delivered to Australian children: study protocol for clinical indicator development. BMJ Open (2015) 0.82
The implications of biomarker evidence for systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol (2012) 0.82
Nation-scale adoption of new medicines by doctors: an application of the Bass diffusion model. BMC Health Serv Res (2012) 0.82
The evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews. PLoS One (2011) 0.81
Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs. Eval Program Plann (2015) 0.81
Intervention Component Analysis (ICA): a pragmatic approach for identifying the critical features of complex interventions. Syst Rev (2015) 0.81
Heterogeneity: we can't live with it, and we can't live without it. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 0.81
Increasing the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions: protocol and intervention design of the MacPLUS FS Factorial Randomized Controlled Trials. Implement Sci (2014) 0.81
Health innovations in patient decision support: Bridging the gaps and challenges. Australas Med J (2013) 0.81
SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review. Syst Rev (2016) 0.81
Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2016) 0.80
CareTrack Kids-part 2. Assessing the appropriateness of the healthcare delivered to Australian children: study protocol for a retrospective medical record review. BMJ Open (2015) 0.80
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Syst Rev (2016) 0.80
Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis. BMC Med (2014) 0.78
Extracting PICO Sentences from Clinical Trial Reports using Supervised Distant Supervision. J Mach Learn Res (2016) 0.78
Title and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students. Syst Rev (2014) 0.78
Bladder cancer--the neglected tumor: a descriptive analysis of publications referenced in MEDLINE and data from the register ClinicalTrials.gov. BMC Urol (2013) 0.78
Uptake of a web-based oncology protocol system: how do cancer clinicians use eviQ cancer treatments online? BMC Cancer (2013) 0.78
Descriptions and interpretations of the ACCORD-Lipid trial in the news and biomedical literature: a cross-sectional analysis. JAMA Intern Med (2014) 0.77
A systematic review of pediatric clinical trials of high dose vitamin D. PeerJ (2016) 0.77
Modern medicine comes online: How putting Wikipedia articles through a medical journal's traditional process can put free, reliable information into as many hands as possible. Open Med (2014) 0.77
Wiki-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult onset sarcoma: a new paradigm in sarcoma evidence. Sarcoma (2015) 0.76
Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care. Cancer Biol Med (2015) 0.76
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management. Ambio (2016) 0.76
How effective are common medications: a perspective based on meta-analyses of major drugs. BMC Med (2015) 0.76
Development and validation of a convenient formula evaluating the value and applicability of medical literature in clinical practice. Pak J Med Sci (2015) 0.76
Dicing with chance, life and death in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: D.I.C.E. 3, a simulation study. J R Soc Med (2014) 0.76
Evidence mapping for decision making: feasibility versus accuracy - when to abandon high sensitivity in electronic searches. Ger Med Sci (2016) 0.75
Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol (2017) 0.75
Systematic Review Checklist: A Standardized Technique for Assessing and Reporting Reviews of Life Cycle Assessment Data. J Ind Ecol (2012) 0.75
The Cochrane Collaboration 20 years in. CMAJ (2013) 0.75
What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions. BMJ Open (2015) 0.75
Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers' interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol (2014) 0.75
Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
Development of a Search Strategy for an Evidence Based Retrieval Service. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014. J Med Libr Assoc (2016) 0.75
A Prototype for a Hybrid System to Support Systematic Review Teams: A Case Study of Organ Transplantation. Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) (2015) 0.75
Ensuring Quality in Online Palliative Care Resources. Cancers (Basel) (2016) 0.75
Routine piloting in systematic reviews--a modified approach? Syst Rev (2014) 0.75
Helping people make well-informed decisions about health care: old and new challenges to achieving the aim of the Cochrane Collaboration. Syst Rev (2013) 0.75
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols. Trials (2016) 0.75
Prioritisation of clinical research by the example of type 2 diabetes: a caregiver-survey on perceived relevance and need for evidence. PLoS One (2012) 0.75
Toward evidence-based decisions in diagnostic radiology: a research and rating process for multiple decision-makers. Acad Radiol (2012) 0.75
Implementation of study results in guidelines and adherence to guidelines in clinical practice. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2016) 0.75
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet (2009) 12.28
The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med (1987) 11.57
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med (2007) 11.51
Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ (1988) 10.90
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med (1987) 10.37
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet (2005) 6.55
Issues in the registration of clinical trials. JAMA (2007) 5.92
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med (2007) 5.86
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 5.57
Meta-analysis in clinical research. Ann Intern Med (1987) 5.16
Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PLoS Med (2008) 3.64
The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy (2003) 2.13
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.84
Decreased survival related to irradiation postoperatively in early operable breast cancer. Lancet (1974) 1.79
Effects of ascorbic acid on the common cold. An evaluation of the evidence. Am J Med (1975) 1.55
The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants? Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2002) 1.45
Updating systematic reviews: an international survey. PLoS One (2010) 1.41
The work of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. One example of technology assessment in perinatal care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (1991) 1.27
Information synthesis: a practical guide. Health Serv Res (1986) 1.23
The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing. Am J Phys Med Rehabil (2009) 1.16
The evaluation of new drugs. Current Food and drug Administration regulations and statistical aspects of clinical trials. Arch Intern Med (1967) 0.97
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2008) 38.76
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet (2009) 12.28
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol (2008) 7.45
When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. BMJ (2007) 6.77
Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA (2010) 5.90
Antibiotics for acute otitis media: a meta-analysis with individual patient data. Lancet (2006) 5.83
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet (2009) 5.57
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ (2004) 4.99
Effect of consent rituals on mortality in emergency care research. Lancet (2011) 4.74
Cardiac impairment or heart failure? BMJ (2005) 4.67
Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ (2005) 4.47
How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review. BMJ (2005) 4.31
Too much medicine; too little care. BMJ (2013) 3.90
Assessing the quality of research. BMJ (2004) 3.90
An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci (2009) 3.77
Why the GMC should set up a central registry of doctors' competing interests. BMJ (2014) 3.69
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60
All trials must be registered and the results published. BMJ (2013) 3.46
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ (2010) 3.27
Corticosteroids for pain relief in sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2009) 3.13
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet (2009) 3.04
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments. BMJ (2004) 2.96
Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet (2010) 2.96
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet (2009) 2.86
Follow-up of blood-pressure lowering and glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2014) 2.64
The paths from research to improved health outcomes. ACP J Club (2005) 2.61
Anticoagulation control and prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2008) 2.61
Magnesium for preventing and treating eclampsia: time for international action. Lancet (2002) 2.58
How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ (2006) 2.38
A surrealistic mega-analysis of redisorganization theories. J R Soc Med (2005) 2.38
Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence. Br J Gen Pract (2007) 2.37
Whispered voice test for screening for hearing impairment in adults and children: systematic review. BMJ (2003) 2.36
General practitioners' self ratings of skills in evidence based medicine: validation study. BMJ (2002) 2.36
Teaching evidence based medicine. BMJ (2004) 2.36
Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable. BMJ (2002) 2.36
Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ (2006) 2.30
The automation of systematic reviews. BMJ (2013) 2.20
Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 2.18
Adding fluoride to water supplies. BMJ (2007) 2.12
How quickly should we titrate antihypertensive medication? Systematic review modelling blood pressure response from trial data. Heart (2011) 2.06
A child with earache. Are antibiotics the best treatment? Aust Fam Physician (2002) 2.03
Is the problem that everything is a diagnosis? Aust Fam Physician (2013) 1.96
Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. J R Soc Med (2007) 1.95
Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. JAMA (2002) 1.95
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.90
Combined effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: New results from the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care (2009) 1.89
Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs. BMJ (2009) 1.88
The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med (2002) 1.86
Systematic review automation technologies. Syst Rev (2014) 1.84
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.84
Using N-of-1 trials to improve patient management and save costs. J Gen Intern Med (2010) 1.80
Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true? Lancet (2006) 1.77
The state of primary-care research. Lancet (2004) 1.76
Commentary: The evolution of methods to assess the effects of treatments, illustrated by the development of treatments for diphtheria, 1825-1918. Int J Epidemiol (2011) 1.76
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.75
Minimal interventions to decrease long-term use of benzodiazepines in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract (2011) 1.71
Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. Lancet (2003) 1.69
Lowering blood pressure reduces renal events in type 2 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol (2009) 1.68
Misunderstandings, misperceptions, and mistakes. ACP J Club (2007) 1.63
What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? BMJ (2008) 1.62
A systematic review and meta-analysis: probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol (2009) 1.60
The GATE frame: critical appraisal with pictures. Evid Based Med (2006) 1.60
Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ? N Z Med J (2010) 1.59
Acute infective conjunctivitis in primary care: who needs antibiotics? An individual patient data meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract (2011) 1.59
Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO. J R Soc Med (2011) 1.53
Point-of-care testing for Hb A1c in the management of diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Chem (2011) 1.53
Evidence based medicine and the medical curriculum. BMJ (2008) 1.52
Misunderstandings, misperceptions, and mistakes. Evid Based Med (2007) 1.51
Publishing information about ongoing clinical trials for patients. BMJ (2010) 1.50
Blood pressure self monitoring: questions and answers from a national conference. BMJ (2008) 1.49
Effects of pravastatin on coronary events in 2073 patients with low levels of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: results from the LIPID study. Eur Heart J (2004) 1.46
New GMC guidance takes a major, ethically flawed, backward step. BMJ (2013) 1.43
Government regulation is needed to prevent biased under-reporting of clinical trials. BMJ (2004) 1.43
The James Lind Initiative. J R Soc Med (2003) 1.43
Medical research: Trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gains. Nature (2013) 1.41
Evidence-based medicine teaching in UK medical schools. Med Teach (2009) 1.39
Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2012) 1.39
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med (2013) 1.36
Effects of visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure on macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ADVANCE trial. Circulation (2013) 1.32
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol (2009) 1.32
New treatments compared to established treatments in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 1.28
Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module. Syst Rev (2015) 1.28
The rise of cholesterol testing: how much is unnecessary. Br J Gen Pract (2011) 1.27
Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk: new findings from ADVANCE. Hypertension (2009) 1.22
Patterns of 'leakage' in the utilisation of clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J (2011) 1.21
The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ (2012) 1.15
The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's 'guidelines for causation' contribute? J R Soc Med (2009) 1.14
Survey of claims of no effect in abstracts of Cochrane reviews. BMJ (2003) 1.14