Published in BMJ Open on October 01, 2015
Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures. Syst Rev (2016) 0.81
Determining the longitudinal validity and meaningful differences in HRQL of the PedsQL™ Sickle Cell Disease Module. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2017) 0.75
Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res (2016) 0.75
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care (1992) 144.02
An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1961) 84.61
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull (1979) 71.07
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials (1989) 15.99
Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol (1994) 9.50
Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc (2002) 7.00
Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med (1998) 6.80
Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ (1998) 3.97
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ (2010) 3.54
Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.69
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 2.55
How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA (2014) 1.86
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2011) 1.81
Commentary--goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res (2005) 1.63
Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 1.15
Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2010) 1.09
Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses-part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers. Health Qual Life Outcomes (2013) 1.06
Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (2012) 1.05
Minimal clinically important differences in Incontinence Quality-of-Life scores in stress urinary incontinence. Urology (2006) 0.94
New methods can extend the use of minimal important difference units in meta-analyses of continuous outcome measures. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 0.92
A distribution model of the responses to each depressive symptom item in a general population: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open (2015) 1.07
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open (2015) 0.85
Management of chronic neuropathic pain: a protocol for a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2014) 0.79
Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies. Acta Psychiatr Scand (2015) 0.76
User-driven conversations about dialysis through Facebook: A qualitative thematic analysis. Nephrology (Carlton) (2017) 0.76
Depressed with cancer can respond to antidepressants, but further research is needed to confirm and expand on these findings. Evid Based Ment Health (2014) 0.75
Polymyxin B-immobilised haemoperfusion and mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis/septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75
Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. BMJ Open (2015) 0.75
Prognosis of delirium. Evid Based Ment Health (2017) 0.75
Helping people with schizophrenia to quit smoking. Evid Based Ment Health (2014) 0.75
Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75
Which psychotherapy for PTSD? Evid Based Ment Health (2016) 0.75
Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics (2017) 0.75