Published in Health Expect on December 01, 2003
Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist. PLoS One (2009) 1.43
Joining the conversation: newspaper journalists' views on working with researchers. Healthc Policy (2005) 1.34
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.30
Media coverage of health issues and how to work more effectively with journalists: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health (2010) 0.96
Quality of health news disseminated in the print media in developing countries: a case study in Iran. BMC Public Health (2012) 0.91
Journalists' views about reporting avian influenza and a potential pandemic: a qualitative study. Influenza Other Respir Viruses (2011) 0.89
SSRI'S and other antidepressant use during pregnancy and potential neonatal adverse effects: impact of a public health advisory and subsequent reports in the news media. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth (2005) 0.87
Does it matter who writes medical news stories? PLoS Med (2010) 0.87
Improving the quality of health news. Int J Prev Med (2012) 0.84
International questionnaire postal response rate: an experiment comparing no return postage to provision of International Postage Vouchers--"Coupon-Réponse International". BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 0.82
Science reporting in Accra, Ghana: sources, barriers and motivational factors. Public Underst Sci (2014) 0.77
Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers. PLoS One (2017) 0.75
Medical Journalism and Emergency Medicine. Emerg (Tehran) (2015) 0.75
Opinion editorials: the science and art of combining evidence with opinion. Evid Based Med (2012) 0.75
Health Reporting in Print Media in Lebanon: Evidence, Quality and Role in Informing Policymaking. PLoS One (2015) 0.75
Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N Engl J Med (2000) 7.50
Medical researchers and the media. Attitudes toward public dissemination of research. JAMA (1992) 2.69
Medical scientists and health news reporting: a case of miscommunication. Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.54
An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press. J Clin Epidemiol (1993) 2.47
An exercise in improving suicide reporting in print media. Crisis (2000) 2.44
An uneasy relationship: the tensions between medicine and the media. Lancet (1996) 2.04
Shattuck lecture--medicine and the media. N Engl J Med (1998) 1.78
Science and the media: the boundaries of truth. Health Aff (Millwood) (1985) 1.27
Judging journalism: how should the quality of news reporting about clinical interventions be assessed and improved? Qual Health Care (1999) 1.12
Credibility in science and the press. Science (1991) 0.90
Health news reporting. Ann Intern Med (1997) 0.88
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77
Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med (2010) 10.82
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 10.32
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98
Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med (2006) 8.18
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 7.86
Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 7.07
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99
Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: comparison of toxicity. J Clin Oncol (2014) 6.62
An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance on the basis of 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2008) 6.00
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78
Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ (2009) 5.68
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 5.57
An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10
Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. JAMA (2006) 5.06
Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 4.11
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93
Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ (2003) 3.92
Times to treatment in transfer patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 analysis. Circulation (2005) 3.78
Proton versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: patterns of care and early toxicity. J Natl Cancer Inst (2012) 3.72
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ (2009) 3.65
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 3.58
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.45
Racial and ethnic differences in time to acute reperfusion therapy for patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction. JAMA (2004) 3.45
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34
Patterns of use and short-term complications of breast brachytherapy in the national medicare population from 2008-2009. J Clin Oncol (2012) 3.34
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet (2008) 3.28
Assessing the impact of a cooperative group trial on breast cancer care in the medicare population. J Clin Oncol (2012) 3.07
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci (2013) 3.00
Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf (2011) 2.98
Evaluating obstetrical residency programs using patient outcomes. JAMA (2009) 2.93
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91
Effectiveness and cost of a transitional care program for heart failure: a prospective study with concurrent controls. Arch Intern Med (2011) 2.88
Hospital strategies for reducing risk-standardized mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.86
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83
Race, quality of care, and outcomes of elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure. JAMA (2003) 2.77
Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Med (2006) 2.67
Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat. BMJ (2002) 2.58
Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines. PLoS Med (2007) 2.57
Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.50
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.46
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.34
Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care (2006) 2.27
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci (2013) 2.25
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24
[Guidelines for pharmacological primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases--who should be treated?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.22
[Which antihypertensive drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.20
[Which cholesterol-lowering drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.19
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.15
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15
Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci (2008) 2.15
HARLOT plc: an amalgamation of the world's two oldest professions. BMJ (2003) 2.14
Improvements in door-to-balloon time in the United States, 2005 to 2010. Circulation (2011) 2.13
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.12
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.05
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.02
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 11: Finding and using evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.00
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.99
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ (2008) 1.94
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ (2010) 1.94
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.90
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87
Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2008) 1.86
GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.86
Hospice characteristics and the disenrollment of patients with cancer. Health Serv Res (2009) 1.86
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.86
WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. Lancet Infect Dis (2007) 1.85
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.84
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.84
Interdisciplinary staffing patterns: do for-profit and nonprofit hospices differ? J Palliat Med (2010) 1.84
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.82
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5: Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.82
Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.81
SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.81
Impact of hospice disenrollment on health care use and medicare expenditures for patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol (2010) 1.81
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.75
Quality improvement efforts and hospital performance: rates of beta-blocker prescription after acute myocardial infarction. Med Care (2005) 1.73
Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol (2005) 1.69
Comparison of directed and self-directed learning in evidence-based medicine: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ (2005) 1.64
What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? BMJ (2008) 1.62
Process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial of tailored interventions to implement guidelines in primary care--why is it so hard to change practice? Fam Pract (2003) 1.61