DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?

PubWeight™: 0.81‹?›

🔗 View Article (PMID 18641262)

Published in Radiology on August 01, 2008

Authors

Daniel B Kopans, Etta D Pisano, Suddhasatta Acharyya, R Edward Hendrick, Martin J Yaffe, Emily F Conant, Laurie L Fajardo, Lawrence W Bassett, Janet K Baum, Constantine A Gatsonis

Articles by these authors

Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med (2005) 14.47

Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 14.32

Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA (2008) 10.92

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ (2003) 10.80

MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 10.28

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (2003) 10.28

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med (2003) 8.58

Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med (2007) 8.58

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem (2003) 8.13

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem (2003) 7.92

Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002) 6.51

Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med (2002) 6.19

Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA (2004) 5.85

Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology (2008) 5.59

Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA (2012) 4.25

A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened. Cancer (2013) 4.21

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 4.07

Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol (2005) 3.99

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA (2004) 3.97

Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys (2003) 3.70

Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology (2006) 3.42

A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys (2004) 3.41

Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst (2003) 3.41

Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2010) 3.39

Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology (2012) 3.36

Breast cancer detection based on incremental biochemical and physiological properties of breast cancers: a six-year, two-site study. Acad Radiol (2005) 3.33

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Fam Pract (2004) 2.99

Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res (2011) 2.86

Staging system for breast cancer: revisions for the 6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Surg Clin North Am (2003) 2.82

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 2.78

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology (2003) 2.73

The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol (2009) 2.68

Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med (2013) 2.66

A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys (2003) 2.49

American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology (2005) 2.42

Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer. Cancer (2014) 2.36

The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology (2013) 2.27

Mammography screening is saving thousands of lives, but will it survive medical malpractice? Radiology (2004) 2.24

Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology (2012) 2.20

Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology (2007) 2.18

Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 2.16

Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology (2010) 2.13

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem Lab Med (2003) 2.10

Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin (2002) 2.07

Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology (2010) 2.06

Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2005) 2.05

Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology (2007) 2.03

Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys (2009) 2.02

In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging (2002) 2.01

Alberta physical activity and breast cancer prevention trial: sex hormone changes in a year-long exercise intervention among postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol (2010) 2.00

Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med (2008) 1.95

Longitudinal trajectories of depression and anxiety in a prospective community study: the Zurich Cohort Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2003) 1.94

Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2006) 1.91

Coregistered tomographic x-ray and optical breast imaging: initial results. J Biomed Opt (2005) 1.89

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. Radiology (2005) 1.87

Design and implementation of a compact low-dose diffraction enhanced medical imaging system. Acad Radiol (2009) 1.87

Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: a comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems. Med Phys (2003) 1.85

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology (2011) 1.81

Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. Radiology (2010) 1.76

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J (2003) 1.76

Combined optical imaging and mammography of the healthy breast: optical contrast derived from breast structure and compression. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2009) 1.76

Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology (2005) 1.70

Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics (2007) 1.70

Tomographic optical breast imaging guided by three-dimensional mammography. Appl Opt (2003) 1.69

Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer (2004) 1.66

Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2010) 1.64

Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Acad Radiol (2003) 1.64

Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging (2007) 1.64

Functional imaging using diffuse optical spectroscopy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in women with locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2010) 1.63

Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology (2002) 1.63

Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys (2006) 1.62

Melanoma early detection with thorough skin self-examination: the "Check It Out" randomized trial. Am J Prev Med (2007) 1.57

Screening for preclinical disease: test and disease characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2002) 1.56

Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation. Radiographics (2014) 1.55

Digital mammography. Radiology (2005) 1.53

Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol (2007) 1.51

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology (2003) 1.49

Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol (2012) 1.49

Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April, 2007. Breast J (2009) 1.48