The impact of a multifaceted intervention including sepsis electronic alert system and sepsis response team on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med (2013) 39.56

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med (2008) 31.57

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess (2004) 29.45

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med (2004) 24.47

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA (2016) 17.49

A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med (2014) 16.05

Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med (2014) 11.32

Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ (1997) 10.22

Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med (2015) 8.24

Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA (2008) 6.29

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med (2010) 4.64

Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med (2006) 4.62

Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department-based early goal-directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest (2007) 4.60

Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med (2007) 4.42

Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols on hospital length of stay and mortality in septic shock patients: results of a three-year follow-up quasi-experimental study. Crit Care Med (2010) 4.22

Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med (2006) 4.10

Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis (2012) 4.07

Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department--results of a national survey. Crit Care Med (2007) 3.28

Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med (2006) 3.18

Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation (2006) 3.16

Impact of an intensivist-led multidisciplinary extended rapid response team on hospital-wide cardiopulmonary arrests and mortality. Crit Care Med (2013) 2.85

Weekend and weeknight admissions have the same outcome of weekday admissions to an intensive care unit with onsite intensivist coverage. Crit Care Med (2006) 2.44

Implementation of a real-time computerized sepsis alert in nonintensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med (2011) 2.35

Maintained effectiveness of an electronic alert system to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. Thromb Haemost (2008) 2.31

A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Shock (2006) 2.26

Effect of a rapid response system for patients in shock on time to treatment and mortality during 5 years. Crit Care Med (2007) 2.04

The ProCESS trial--a new era of sepsis management. N Engl J Med (2014) 2.04

Implementing early goal-directed therapy in the emergency setting: the challenges and experiences of translating research innovations into clinical reality in academic and community settings. Acad Emerg Med (2007) 1.95

Septic shock: a multidisciplinary response team and weekly feedback to clinicians improve the process of care and mortality. Crit Care Med (2011) 1.85

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM (2008) 1.76

Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study. BMJ (2011) 1.64

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med (2017) 1.54

Prospective trial of real-time electronic surveillance to expedite early care of severe sepsis. Ann Emerg Med (2011) 1.51

Impact of protocol watch on compliance with the surviving sepsis campaign. Am J Crit Care (2011) 1.44

Decreasing mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients by implementing a sepsis bundle in a hospital setting. PLoS One (2011) 1.35

Real-time identification of serious infection in geriatric patients using clinical information system surveillance. J Am Geriatr Soc (2009) 1.17

Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior. Syst Rev (2012) 1.12

Implementation of early goal-directed therapy and the surviving sepsis campaign resuscitation bundle in Asia. Int J Qual Health Care (2012) 0.96

Effect of a pediatric trauma response team on emergency department treatment time and mortality of pediatric trauma victims. Pediatrics (1999) 0.87

Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china. J Emerg Med (2013) 0.86

Evidence-based therapies for sepsis care in the emergency department: striking a balance between feasibility and necessity. Acad Emerg Med (2005) 0.85

Impact of acute stroke team emergency calls on in-hospital delays in acute stroke care. J Clin Neurosci (2007) 0.83

Clinical pathway intervention compliance and effectiveness when used in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock at an Intensive Care Unit in Spain. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem (2012) 0.79

Evaluation of process variations in noncompliance in the implementation of evidence-based sepsis care. J Healthc Qual (2011) 0.77

Thromboprophylaxis using combined intermittent pneumatic compression and pharmacologic prophylaxis versus pharmacologic prophylaxis alone in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2016) 1.38

Erratum to: Thromboprophylaxis using combined intermittent pneumatic compression and pharmacologic prophylaxis versus pharmacologic prophylaxis alone in critically ill patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2016) 0.75

Patient-physician relationship in specific cultural settings. Intensive Care Med (2017) 0.75

Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in High and Low Nutritional Risk Critically Ill Adults: Post-hoc Analysis of the PermiT trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2016) 0.75

The intensive care medicine research agenda in nutrition and metabolism. Intensive Care Med (2017) 0.75

Reply: Is Less Really More with Respect to Permissive Feeding in Critical Illness? Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2017) 0.75