Published in Ann Intern Med on April 17, 2001
Comparison of Casting Materials for the Treatment of Clubfoot Using the Ponseti Method | NCT01067651
Trial for the Treatment of Pelvic and Back Pain in Pregnancy (GRIP) | NCT00830934
Prolonged Treatment for Infected Abortion After Hospital Discharge. (APA) | NCT00376493
Compassion and Mindfulness Training for The Well-Being of Diverse College Students | NCT05227794
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med (2009) 65.36
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (2009) 34.99
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 28.70
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (2009) 22.18
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2009) 21.74
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ (2003) 18.72
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ (2004) 16.50
Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol (2010) 13.76
Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA (2006) 12.22
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (2008) 11.08
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2007) 10.43
Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health (2004) 10.12
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care (2005) 8.53
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med (2009) 8.25
Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One (2009) 7.60
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med (2010) 7.43
Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke (2009) 6.79
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med (2010) 6.27
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2008) 5.85
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ (2010) 5.58
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2001) 5.43
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Cancer (2005) 4.85
Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2006) 4.79
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ (2004) 4.69
Efficacy of interventions in improving highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence and HIV-1 RNA viral load. A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (2006) 4.49
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med (2009) 4.43
Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis. CMAJ (2009) 4.38
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev (2012) 4.36
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg (2002) 4.21
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. Trials (2008) 4.17
A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol (2008) 4.16
Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ (2004) 4.10
How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychol (2008) 4.04
Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ (2005) 3.94
Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ (2005) 3.65
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med (2012) 3.62
Food elimination based on IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Gut (2004) 3.55
Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of oral diabetes medications: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med (2008) 3.54
Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophr Bull (2007) 3.52
Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2011) 3.37
Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care (2008) 3.30
Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006. Arch Intern Med (2008) 3.07
Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better? Ann Surg (2006) 3.01
Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2004) 2.90
Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials. BMJ (2004) 2.88
Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BMJ (2005) 2.80
Hookworm-related anaemia among pregnant women: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2008) 2.77
Anecdotes as evidence. BMJ (2003) 2.66
The efficacy of behavioral interventions in reducing HIV risk behaviors and incident sexually transmitted diseases in heterosexual African Americans. AIDS (2008) 2.65
Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health (2011) 2.60
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers. BMC Med Res Methodol (2004) 2.57
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols. BMJ (2008) 2.56
Missing outcomes in randomized trials: addressing the dilemma. Open Med (2009) 2.48
Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design. BMJ (2005) 2.43
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med (2009) 2.39
Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments? JAMA (2005) 2.37
Descriptive epidemiology and prior healthcare utilization of patients in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial's (SPORT) three observational cohorts: disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2006) 2.30
The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (2009) 2.29
Are randomised controlled trials in the BMJ different? BMJ (2001) 2.26
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect (2013) 2.21
Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine. Ann Fam Med (2011) 2.20
A randomized stepped care intervention trial targeting posttraumatic stress disorder for surgically hospitalized injury survivors. Ann Surg (2013) 2.13
The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis? BMC Neurosci (2010) 2.13
Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol (2008) 2.10
A pilot whole systems clinical trial of traditional Chinese medicine and naturopathic medicine for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Altern Complement Med (2008) 2.10
Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: The ACTG 320 trial. Am J Epidemiol (2010) 2.07
Point-of-care C-reactive protein testing and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med (2010) 2.07
Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting. J Clin Oncol (2012) 2.05
IMPACT trial results should not change current standard of care of 100 days for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis. Am J Transplant (2010) 2.05
Standards of reporting Ayurvedic clinical trials - Is there a need? J Ayurveda Integr Med (2010) 2.03
Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials. Trials (2009) 2.01
Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. BMJ (2008) 2.00
Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. BMJ (2005) 2.00
Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials. Trials (2006) 1.98
Parental involvement in interventions to improve child dietary intake: a systematic review. Prev Med (2010) 1.98
Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care (2010) 1.97
Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med (2011) 1.92
The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review. Ann Surg (2006) 1.91
Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. BMJ (2009) 1.91
Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ (2008) 1.90
Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in three-through six year-old children: a randomized clinical trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry (2010) 1.86
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med (2012) 1.85
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)--an extension of the STROBE statement. Eur J Clin Invest (2009) 1.82
A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality. Rev Recent Clin Trials (2009) 1.80
IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol. Implement Sci (2008) 1.79
Exercise as migraine prophylaxis: a randomized study using relaxation and topiramate as controls. Cephalalgia (2011) 1.79
Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med (2007) 1.77
Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond. CMAJ (2004) 1.77
Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ (2009) 1.76
Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): Do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? J Med Internet Res (2009) 1.76
ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak (2010) 1.74
Including all individuals is not enough: lessons for intention-to-treat analysis. Clin Trials (2012) 1.71
Current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis (2005) 1.70
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA (2000) 55.37
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA (1996) 36.04
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet (2001) 31.74
Evidence based medicine. BMJ (1995) 21.24
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ (2001) 20.65
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA (2001) 19.20
Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet (2001) 18.46
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA (1999) 17.00
A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev (2007) 14.60
Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med (2001) 13.07
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol (2001) 12.72
Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ (1995) 11.94
The informationist: a new health profession? Ann Intern Med (2000) 11.70
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med (2001) 11.48
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol (2000) 7.95
Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA (1996) 7.39
Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ (2001) 7.13
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Lancet (2001) 7.10
Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med (1997) 6.73
Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess (2007) 6.55
The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA (1997) 6.32
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. N Engl J Med (2001) 6.20
Sponsorship, authorship and accountability. CMAJ (2001) 5.86
Who benefits from medical interventions? BMJ (1994) 5.58
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol (2001) 5.43
WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour. Lancet (2001) 5.25
The 28th Amendment. Ann Intern Med (1999) 4.99
Case-related use of the medical literature. Clinical librarian services for improving patient care. JAMA (1981) 4.91
Secret government: the Scott report. BMJ (1996) 4.83
Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Lancet (1999) 4.83
Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA (1998) 4.73
Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ (2001) 4.49
Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ (2001) 4.47
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the glass is half occupied. Ann Intern Med (1995) 4.45
Socioeconomic differentials in wealth and health. BMJ (1993) 4.32
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet (2000) 4.16
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 4.12
Active versus expectant management of third stage of labour: the Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial. Lancet (1998) 4.01
Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research. Lancet (1996) 3.99
Changing the subject: ethical principles for everyone in health care. Ann Intern Med (2000) 3.88
West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) (1984) 3.85
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol (2007) 3.84
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest (2010) 3.83
Magnesium and myocardial infarction. Lancet (1994) 3.74
Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2002) 3.68
Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 3.51
HIV and male circumcision--a systematic review with assessment of the quality of studies. Lancet Infect Dis (2005) 3.49
Prevalence and clinical outcome of hepatitis C infection in children who underwent cardiac surgery before the implementation of blood-donor screening. N Engl J Med (1999) 3.38
What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol (2000) 3.37
Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment. J Intern Med (2004) 3.37
Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study. BMJ (1998) 3.37
AIDS-related opportunistic illnesses occurring after initiation of potent antiretroviral therapy: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. JAMA (1999) 3.34
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess (2001) 3.32
Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2007) 3.30
Occupational and environmental medicine. Meeting the growing need for clinical services. N Engl J Med (1991) 3.25
The effectiveness of glucocorticoids in treating croup: meta-analysis. BMJ (1999) 3.25
Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2003) 3.22
Smoking and health promotion in Nazi Germany. J Epidemiol Community Health (1994) 3.20
Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998. BMJ (2001) 3.12
Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2001) 3.06
Reframing gun violence. Ann Intern Med (1998) 2.86
Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study. BMJ (1998) 2.83
Do all men attending departments of genitourinary medicine need to be screened for non-gonococcal urethritis? Int J STD AIDS (2002) 2.81
Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study--Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Body Composition Working Group. J Appl Physiol (1985) (1999) 2.81
Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients' and physicians' opinions. Ann Intern Med (1996) 2.79
The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records. Br J Obstet Gynaecol (1987) 2.78
Time. Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.78
Garlic or jalapeño peppers for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol (1999) 2.77
How efficacious and safe is short-acting methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. CMAJ (2001) 2.74
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc (2001) 2.71
Evidence for inhibition of fusion of lysosomal and prelysosomal compartments with phagosomes in macrophages infected with pathogenic Mycobacterium avium. Infect Immun (1986) 2.71
Where's the bias? Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.68
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Ann Intern Med (2001) 2.66
Funding clinical research. Lancet (1999) 2.63
Prognostic performance and customization of the SAPS II: results of a multicenter Austrian study. Simplified Acute Physiology Score. Intensive Care Med (1999) 2.61
Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res (1996) 2.47
Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2005) 2.41
The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. Health Technol Assess (2005) 2.38
The Swiss HIV Cohort Study: rationale, organization and selected baseline characteristics. Soz Praventivmed (1994) 2.38
Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial. Control Clin Trials (1999) 2.37
Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Uppsala County, Sweden, 1985-1993: declining rates for how much longer? Sex Transm Dis (1995) 2.36
Weighing the alternatives: lessons from the paradoxes of alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med (1998) 2.36
Commentary: understanding it all--health, meta-theories, and mortality trends. BMJ (1997) 2.35
The heartbreak of drug pricing. Ann Intern Med (2001) 2.35
Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2003) 2.32
Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Ann Intern Med (1997) 2.29
Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2000) 2.26
Are randomised controlled trials in the BMJ different? BMJ (2001) 2.26
Hyperlactatemia and antiretroviral therapy: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis (2001) 2.24
The in-training examination in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med (1994) 2.23
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection. Health Technol Assess (2007) 2.23
Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected adults treated with combination antiretroviral therapy. Swiss HIV Cohort Study. N Engl J Med (1999) 2.17
Tuberculosis in HIV programmes in lower-income countries: practices and risk factors. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis (2011) 2.15
Randomized controlled trials of home uterine activity monitoring: a review and critique. Obstet Gynecol (1992) 2.14