Tailored interventions to implement recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: a study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Identifying determinants of care for tailoring implementation in chronic diseases: an evaluation of different methods. Implement Sci (2014) 1.22

Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD): a protocol for process evaluation in cluster randomized controlled trials in five European countries. Trials (2014) 1.16

Determinants of adherence to recommendations for depressed elderly patients in primary care: a multi-methods study. Scand J Prim Health Care (2014) 0.87

Stakeholders' contributions to tailored implementation programs: an observational study of group interview methods. Implement Sci (2014) 0.87

Process evaluation of five tailored programs to improve the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for chronic conditions in primary care. Implement Sci (2016) 0.84

A tailored intervention to implement guideline recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci (2016) 0.79

Tailoring interventions to implement recommendations for the treatment of elderly patients with depression: a qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Syst (2015) 0.79

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual in Adult Patients With Emotional Disorders in the Primary Care Setting (PsicAP Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc (2016) 0.77

Retention strategies for health disparities preventive trials: findings from the Early Childhood Caries Collaborating Centers. J Public Health Dent (2016) 0.76

Impact of a tailored program on the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for multimorbid patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices-results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci (2017) 0.76

A tailored programme to implement recommendations for multimorbid patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices-process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci (2017) 0.75

Disentangling the concept of "the complex older patient" in general practice: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract (2016) 0.75

The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand (1983) 121.58

Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care (1986) 22.65

Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2002) 15.53

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98

Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Lancet (2009) 7.15

Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 5.99

Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 4.21

A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci (2013) 3.00

Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Med (2006) 2.67

Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat. BMJ (2002) 2.58

Disparities in the adequacy of depression treatment in the United States. Psychiatr Serv (2004) 2.35

Tailored Implementation For Chronic Diseases (TICD): a project protocol. Implement Sci (2011) 2.25

Compliance with tricyclic antidepressants: the value of four different methods of assessment. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2000) 2.05

Compliance with antidepressants in a primary care setting, 1: Beyond lack of efficacy and adverse events. J Clin Psychiatry (2001) 1.70

[Occurrence of depression in the elderly--a systematic review of 55 prevalence studies from 1990-2001]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2003) 1.45

Prognosis of depression in old age compared to middle age: a systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Psychiatry (2005) 1.41

The depression care manager and mental health specialist as collaborators within primary care. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry (2003) 1.35

Prevalence, correlates and recognition of depression in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus study. J Affect Disord (2004) 1.28

Three-year prognosis of depression in the community-dwelling elderly. Br J Psychiatry (2000) 1.17

The prognosis of depression in older patients in general practice and the community. A systematic review. Fam Pract (2007) 1.15

A randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2002) 1.07

Implementing evidence-based guidelines for managing depression in elderly patients: a Norwegian perspective. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci (2012) 1.06

Increased prevalence of depression in cohorts of the elderly: an 11-year follow-up in the general population - the HUNT study. Int Psychogeriatr (2011) 1.05

Psychiatric epidemiology of old age: the H70 study--the NAPE lecture 2003. Acta Psychiatr Scand (2004) 1.03

Concordance between clinician and patient ratings as predictors of response, remission, and recurrence in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res (2010) 1.03

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for depression and anxiety disorders is associated with recording of the diagnosis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry (2009) 1.02

Prevalence, incidence, and persistence of major depressive symptoms in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Aging Ment Health (2010) 1.02

Loneliness, health and social network among elderly people--a follow-up study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr (2004) 1.01

Are older people dying of depression? Findings from the Medical Research Council trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc (2005) 1.01

Initial prescription of antipsychotics and antidepressants in general practice and specialist care in Norway. Acta Psychiatr Scand (2011) 0.99

Is depression in old age fatal only when people feel lonely? Am J Psychiatry (2005) 0.95

Loneliness in old age: longitudinal changes and their determinants in an Israeli sample. Int Psychogeriatr (2009) 0.94

The role of provider attitudes in prescribing antidepressants to older adults: leverage points for effective provider education. Int J Psychiatry Med (2003) 0.92

An illness perception model of primary care patients' help seeking for depression. Qual Health Res (2011) 0.81

[PGI-I (patient's global impression) as an outcome and quality indicator of psychiatric in-patient treatment: results and concordance with doctor's assessments]. Psychiatr Prax (2010) 0.81

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (2011) 29.14

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 11.77

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2012) 10.32

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02

Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ (2008) 9.98

A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 7.86

Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2010) 7.64

Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ (2008) 7.30

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20

Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 7.07

Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q (2007) 7.06

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (2008) 6.99

What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust (2004) 6.82

GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 5.78

Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ (2009) 5.68

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2009) 5.57

An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10

Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Q (2008) 4.87

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.93

Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. CMAJ (2003) 3.92

On the trail of quality and safety in health care. BMJ (2008) 3.82

Quality of after-hours primary care in the Netherlands: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med (2011) 3.67

A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ (2009) 3.65

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 3.60

GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 3.58

The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res (2008) 3.58

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.45

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 3.34

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30

Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet (2008) 3.28

The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect (2005) 3.18

Antivirals for treatment of influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.05

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02

A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci (2013) 3.00

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.93

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83

Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Med (2006) 2.67

Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis. J Eval Clin Pract (2007) 2.66

Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat. BMJ (2002) 2.58

Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines. PLoS Med (2007) 2.57

Translating research into policy and practice in developing countries: a case study of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.50

Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for older adults: a review. Am J Prev Med (2002) 2.50

GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol (2013) 2.46

Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.34

Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care (2006) 2.27

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Implement Sci (2013) 2.25

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.24

[Guidelines for pharmacological primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases--who should be treated?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.22

[Which antihypertensive drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.20

[Which cholesterol-lowering drugs should be used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (2002) 2.19

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.15

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 2.15

Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci (2008) 2.15

HARLOT plc: an amalgamation of the world's two oldest professions. BMJ (2003) 2.14

User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol (2010) 2.12

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.05

SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.02

COPD prognosis in relation to diagnostic criteria for airflow obstruction in smokers. Eur Respir J (2013) 2.02

SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 11: Finding and using evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 2.00

Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect (2003) 1.99

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.99

Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ (2010) 1.94

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ (2008) 1.94

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.90

Out-of-hours care in western countries: assessment of different organizational models. BMC Health Serv Res (2009) 1.89

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.87

Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2008) 1.86

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.86

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.86

WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. Lancet Infect Dis (2007) 1.85

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.84

The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (2009) 1.84

Medical messages in the media--barriers and solutions to improving medical journalism. Health Expect (2003) 1.84

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.82

Organizational change to transfer knowledge and improve quality and outcomes of care for patients with severe mental illness: a systematic overview of reviews. Can J Psychiatry (2008) 1.82

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5: Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.82

Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 1.81

SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies. Health Res Policy Syst (2009) 1.81

Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2005) 1.81

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.80

Rehabilitation interventions for postintensive care syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care Med (2014) 1.78

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol (2012) 1.75

Patient safety features are more present in larger primary care practices. Health Policy (2010) 1.66

What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations? BMJ (2008) 1.62

Process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial of tailored interventions to implement guidelines in primary care--why is it so hard to change practice? Fam Pract (2003) 1.61

Interventions to improve medication compliance in older patients living in the community: a systematic review of the literature. Drugs Aging (2003) 1.58

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 15. Disseminating and implementing guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst (2006) 1.57

Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (2002) 1.55

Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract (2008) 1.55