Published in J Orthop Trauma on September 01, 2002
Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 1.97
Patient-related risk factors for fracture-healing complications in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Acta Orthop (2012) 1.12
Does lengthening and then plating (LAP) shorten duration of external fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res (2011) 1.07
Outcome instruments: rationale for their use. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2009) 1.04
Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2013) 1.00
The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. Skeletal Radiol (2013) 0.95
Association between timing of zoledronic acid infusion and hip fracture healing. Osteoporos Int (2010) 0.94
Expandable intramedullary nailing and platelet rich plasma to treat long bone non-unions. J Orthop Traumatol (2008) 0.93
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Nonunions. Indian J Orthop (2009) 0.84
Electrical stimulation: Nonunions. Indian J Orthop (2009) 0.84
Current Options for Determining Fracture Union. Adv Med (2014) 0.84
Biological and molecular profile of fracture non-union tissue: current insights. J Cell Mol Med (2015) 0.81
Overview of skeletal repair (fracture healing and its assessment). Methods Mol Biol (2014) 0.78
Exuberant sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers in nonhealed bone fractures and the generation and maintenance of chronic skeletal pain. Pain (2014) 0.78
The impact of clinical data on the evaluation of tibial fracture healing. Trials (2011) 0.78
Bone healing in 2016. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab (2016) 0.78
Fracture healing: a consensus report from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Working Group. Osteoporos Int (2016) 0.76
Automated measurement of fracture callus in radiographs using portable software. J Orthop Res (2016) 0.76
Development and preliminary validation of a Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT). Can J Surg (2013) 0.75
Will My Tibial Fracture Heal? Predicting Nonunion at the Time of Definitive Fixation Based on Commonly Available Variables. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 0.75
Ability and limitation of radiographic assessment of fracture healing in rats. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2009) 0.75
The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre. Bone Joint Res (2016) 0.75
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST). Rev Bras Ortop (2016) 0.75
An electronically instrumented internal fixator for the assessment of bone healing. Bone Joint Res (2016) 0.75
Tibia Fracture Healing Prediction Using First-Order Mathematical Model. Comput Math Methods Med (2015) 0.75
Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation. Indian J Orthop (2016) 0.75
Does Computed Tomography Change our Observation and Management of Fracture Non-Unions? Arch Bone Jt Surg (2016) 0.75
Comparing the Incidence of Falls/Fractures in Parkinson's Disease Patients in the US Population. PLoS One (2016) 0.75
The risk of non-union per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthop (2017) 0.75
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa and North America: a meta-analysis. JAMA (2006) 11.71
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 8.43
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med (2013) 6.56
Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA (2010) 5.90
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 5.67
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2002) 5.57
A Trial of Wound Irrigation in the Initial Management of Open Fracture Wounds. N Engl J Med (2015) 5.28
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ (2002) 4.84
Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ (2004) 4.53
Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 4.46
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). J Med Internet Res (2004) 4.45
The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med (2009) 4.41
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 4.25
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2014) 3.96
Combined corticosteroid and antiviral treatment for Bell palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2009) 3.81
A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 3.75
The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials (2002) 3.62
Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ (2002) 3.57
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ (2010) 3.54
Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.44
An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med (2002) 3.36
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.36
Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol (2002) 3.36
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ (2005) 3.26
Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2009) 3.22
The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 3.20
Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.14
Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2010) 3.13
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2007) 3.06
Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008) 3.01
Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.95
Does ratification of human-rights treaties have effects on population health? Lancet (2009) 2.93
Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care (2004) 2.93
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91
Oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.91
Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 2.90
Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med (2007) 2.82
Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA (2008) 2.77
Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2004) 2.76
Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.69
Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ (2012) 2.69
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing readmission rates and mortality rates in patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med (2004) 2.68
Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005) 2.68
Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with prosthetic joints: Comparisons of antibiotic regimens for patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Am Dent Assoc (2015) 2.60
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). J Med Internet Res (2004) 2.59
Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club (2002) 2.58
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2013) 2.58
An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. J Clin Epidemiol (2004) 2.58
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. BMJ (2004) 2.55
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 2.55
Risk prediction models for mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail (2013) 2.50
Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest (2012) 2.50
Comparison of early and delayed fixation of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years of age or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 2.44
Percutaneous management of Morel-Lavallee lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2006) 2.34
Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012) 2.31
How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA (2012) 2.28
A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States. Open Med (2007) 2.26
Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. Ann Intern Med (2007) 2.21
Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit. J Clin Epidemiol (2007) 2.20
Subcapital hip fractures: the Garden classification should be replaced, not collapsed. Can J Surg (2002) 2.19