Published in PLoS One on February 25, 2013
Systemic safety of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 1.95
Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg (2016) 0.87
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. BMJ Open (2015) 0.85
The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev (2014) 0.83
Operative versus nonoperative interventions for common fractures of the clavicle: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ Open (2015) 0.83
Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches. Syst Rev (2015) 0.81
Local anesthetic injections with or without steroid for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Syst Rev (2016) 0.80
Management of chronic neuropathic pain: a protocol for a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2014) 0.79
Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Syst Rev (2013) 0.77
A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in chronic conditions: a review protocol. Syst Rev (2014) 0.77
Effectiveness of moxibustion for allergic rhinitis: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open (2015) 0.77
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus conventional glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a systematic review study protocol. BMJ Open (2015) 0.77
Efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in the treatment of erythema migrans in early Lyme borreliosis-systematic review protocol. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
Shorter or longer anticoagulation to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open (2014) 0.75
Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study. Syst Rev (2014) 0.75
Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75
Electronic nicotine delivery systems and/or electronic non-nicotine delivery systems for tobacco smoking cessation or reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open (2017) 0.75
Brazilian oral herbal medication for osteoarthritis: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
The Contribution of Individual Exercise Training Components to Clinical Outcomes in Randomised Controlled Trials of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression. Sports Med Open (2017) 0.75
Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. BMJ Open (2015) 0.75
Hemicraniectomy versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open (2016) 0.75
Association between mesothelin expression and survival outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
Acupuncture for discomfort in patients during gastroscopy: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open (2014) 0.75
Cinacalcet versus standard treatment for chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev (2016) 0.75
Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials. Sci Rep (2016) 0.75
Brazilian medicinal plants to treat upper respiratory tract and bronchial illness: systematic review and meta-analyses-study protocol. BMJ Open (2014) 0.75
Adverse outcomes associated with opioid prescription for acute low back pain: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev (2017) 0.75
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ (2010) 28.70
Sampling-based approach to determining outcomes of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral therapy scale-up programs in Africa. JAMA (2008) 5.68
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 5.67
Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ (2002) 4.70
Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ (2011) 4.12
Intention-to-treat principle. CMAJ (2001) 3.20
Oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.91
Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option? Stat Med (1991) 2.14
Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol (2009) 2.12
Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. BMJ (2012) 1.85
Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Trials (2008) 1.76
Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. Stat Med (2001) 1.65
Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature. PLoS One (2012) 1.48
LOST to follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): a protocol on the potential impact. Trials (2009) 1.32
Simple approaches to assess the possible impact of missing outcome information on estimates of risk ratios, odds ratios, and risk differences. Control Clin Trials (2003) 1.05
Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients lost to follow-up. Br J Surg (2010) 0.92
Reporting of loss to follow-up information in randomised controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: a literature survey. BMC Med Res Methodol (2011) 0.90
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2008) 33.10
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (2004) 26.08
Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA (2009) 13.00
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa and North America: a meta-analysis. JAMA (2006) 11.71
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med (2008) 11.00
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 10.02
Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA (2005) 8.43
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res (2004) 7.20
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ (2008) 6.72
High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med (2013) 6.56
Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data. CMAJ (2009) 6.27
Aspirin in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med (2014) 6.10
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med (2015) 6.06
Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA (2010) 5.90
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 5.67
Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2002) 5.57
An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2006) 5.29
A Trial of Wound Irrigation in the Initial Management of Open Fracture Wounds. N Engl J Med (2015) 5.28
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ (2008) 5.16
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 5.10
Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2013) 5.08
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ (2002) 4.84
Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet (2011) 4.78
Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA (2012) 4.58
Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). J Med Internet Res (2004) 4.45
The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med (2009) 4.41
Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J (2006) 4.38
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2005) 4.34
Short-term vs conventional glucocorticoid therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the REDUCE randomized clinical trial. JAMA (2013) 4.33
An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002) 4.25
Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med (2006) 4.19
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2014) 3.96
Combined corticosteroid and antiviral treatment for Bell palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2009) 3.81
A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2008) 3.75
The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Control Clin Trials (2002) 3.62
Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ (2002) 3.57
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.54
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ (2010) 3.54
Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 3.44
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.44
The effect of selenium therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med (2013) 3.43
Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med (2002) 3.36
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.36
Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol (2002) 3.36
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.30
Adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation: a systematic review. Pediatrics (2006) 3.28
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials. BMJ (2005) 3.26
Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (2009) 3.22
Intensive care unit quality improvement: a "how-to" guide for the interdisciplinary team. Crit Care Med (2006) 3.15
Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am (2003) 3.14
Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2010) 3.13
Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med (2011) 3.07
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (2007) 3.06
Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med (2006) 3.06
Antivirals for treatment of influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intern Med (2012) 3.05
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 3.02
Procalcitonin algorithms for antibiotic therapy decisions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and recommendations for clinical algorithms. Arch Intern Med (2011) 2.97
Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2015) 2.95
Does ratification of human-rights treaties have effects on population health? Lancet (2009) 2.93
Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care (2004) 2.93
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res (2005) 2.91
Oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors versus low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med (2012) 2.91
Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 2.90
Rationing critical care beds: a systematic review. Crit Care Med (2004) 2.86
The efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med (2015) 2.85
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.83
Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med (2007) 2.82
Interaction of vasopressin infusion, corticosteroid treatment, and mortality of septic shock. Crit Care Med (2009) 2.77
Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA (2008) 2.77
Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (2004) 2.76
Response, survival, and long-term toxicity after therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analogue [90Y-DOTA]-TOC in metastasized neuroendocrine cancers. J Clin Oncol (2011) 2.72
Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ (2012) 2.69
Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid. J Clin Epidemiol (2011) 2.69